I think if anyone can figure out how to do annotation well, that will be a killer app, but so far there is no "YouTube for annotations".
Most of the PLoS content is not very accessible/interesting to me, but I did explore Concentration of the Most-Cited Papers in the Scientific Literature: Analysis of Journal Ecosystems. PLoS supports both annotations and discussions.
As well, many (but not all) of the reference have a "find this article online" link. As far as I can tell, it parses the link up into a format it can pass to PubMed or Google Scholar. So for example
Garfield E. (2006) The history and meaning of the impact factor. JAMA 295: 90–93.
has a link
presumably if you want to hack, err, "mashup" PLoS findArticle, you just have to pass it an appropriate author= and title=
When you click the above link, you get yet another PLoS page, which says
The article may exist at:
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
which seems like a rather click-heavy way to get to a result set.
The links it constructs are
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Garfield%5Bauthor%5D+AND+The history and meaning of the impact factor.
http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&safe=off&q=author%3AGarfield+%22The history and meaning of the impact factor.%22
Is it just me or are we maybe not leveraging the full richness of article metadata here?
As far as I can tell, PLoS ONE knows nothing about OpenURLs, or resolvers.
via Open Access News - PLoS ONE launches
Comments