I think this work could be summarized as "research workflow is complex".
Scott Wilson's Workblog has a presentation and paper on Collaboration workflow for researchers.
via http://del.icio.us/destarrow/collaboration-research-workflow
« open attention data event in New York | Main | more geobooking from Google »
March 09, 2007
Comments
The comments to this entry are closed.
Search
RSS Feed
![[add RSS feed]](http://www.feedburner.com/fb/images/pub/fb_pwrd8831.gif)
![[add RSS feed]](http://www.feedburner.com/fb/images/pub/feed-icon32x32.png)
Subscribe to this blog's feed
Follow Twitter @scilibfeed for notification of new posts.
Receive via Email
Twitter Updates
Recent Comments
- Roger on Ottawa Minecraft map
- Nick on Why Hackathon?
- Deniszgonjanin on G8 Open Data Charter, updated Canadian national open data portal
- Kent on Gov as a startup - notes on talk by Audrey Chen of the CFPB
- Charlie Gruszczynski on UK national real-time train and bus open data
- GabrielCossette on Government of Quebec open data and open government - the Gautrin Report
- mb on Facebook and Instagram unseriously explained
- Steve on Desperately Seeking Updates: An Unplanned Dopamine Experiment
- Livia Barton on learning about open data from our peers
- Marknca on Twitter retweets - how to drink less from the firehose
Recent Posts
- End of Line
- finding France Culture radio audiobooks
- finding BBC Radio audiobooks
- Twitter deactivated
- Work blogs: Sean Boots
- Meta: A rare post
- Problems with audiobook voice control interoperability on smart speakers
- 2023 G7 Science Ministers’ Communiqué
- Mastodon
- Call for Proposals - Open Research Symposium: Building an open research community at McGill
Categories
- Academic Library Future
- Access2005
- Access2006
- Access2007
- ALA2005
- AP2007
- Artificial Intelligence
- Bookmarking
- Bookmarklets
- Books
- Carbon Offset
- CFLAFS2005
- Chief Science Advisor
- CIL2005
- CISTI
- CLA2006
- Climate Change
- Cloud Computing
- CODS15
- collaboration
- Conference
- consultation
- csvconf
- Current Affairs
- Cyberinfrastructure
- Data Management
- Digital Library
- Digital Research Infrastructure
- Distributed Authentication
- DLFfall2007
- DLSci06
- Document Delivery
- E-Commerce
- E-Science
- ECDL2006
- EJOS
- Enterprise Architecture
- eOECD
- EuroFedora2005
- Federated Searching
- Film
- Firefox extensions
- Folksonomy
- G7
- Games
- goc3
- Government 2.0
- Grid Computing
- gtec2011
- IATUL2007
- ICSTI2007
- icsti2009
- Ideas Market
- IFLA2008science
- IL05
- IL2004
- ILI2005
- Info about RSS
- InfoGrid2005
- Information Architecture
- Information Systems Security
- Innovation
- Instant Messaging
- Institutional Repository
- International Open Data Day
- IODC15
- JCDL2011
- Knowledge Management
- Links to Audio
- Links to Presentations
- Links to Video
- Mapping
- Metadata
- Music
- NDRIO
- nisodiscovery2008
- northernvoice
- NRC jobs
- NRC KITS
- NRC KM
- NRC Knowledge Management
- OAI
- OC Transpo
- oecdwebforum2007
- OKFest
- okfest14
- OPAC
- Open Access
- Open Data
- Open Government
- Open Science
- Open Source
- opengovcan
- opengovchat
- OpenURL
- or08
- Photo
- Podcasting
- Presentation Notes
- Privacy
- Publishing
- Research Data
- Research Tools
- RSS Feed Tools
- Science
- SciFoo2007
- Searching
- Second Life
- Semantic Web
- Seminar
- Service-Oriented Architecture
- ShakingItUp14
- SLA2005
- Social Networking
- Software Development
- SPARC2008
- Storage
- Technology Foresight
- Television
- Travel
- Videoblogging
- visualization
- Web Services
- Web/Tech
- Weblogs
- Wiki
- Wireless Internet
- Workflow
- XML
Yeah, but it doesn't cite anything from the CREW research team and the science of collaboratories project which seems an obvious thing. I mean, it seems really strange that the citations are going to online/distributed learning work instead of to the things about doing science in distributed collaborations (like Walsh and Maloney stuff, too). huh.
Posted by: Christina Pikas | March 09, 2007 at 09:23 AM