I found the following presentation very interesting, it presents an attempt to completely model all aspects of scientific communication. Very ambitious and also a useful step in getting us all to a common vocabulary and understanding. I think there are still many challenges, including getting us all onto a common modelling standard, and modelling library activities beyond just the scholarly communication parts. CISTI has done a lot of work in this area, and I will be talking about some of it tomorrow (June 12).
Bo-Christer Björk
Hanken, Svenska handelshögskolan, Helsinki, Finland
A model of scientific communication of a global distributed information system
http://informationr.net/ir/12-2/paper307.html
[modeling scientific communication IT systems]
Two ways for complex info systems to develop
* top down, planned
* bottom up, independently
scientific communication is a good example of bottom up
common items in scientific communication
- article, author, journal etc.
main uses of info in sci com
* communicating research results
* supporting funders and university administrators in deciding about grants and appointments
Backgorund of the SCLC model
* developed since 2000
* SciX project (EC)
* OACS project (Academy of Finland)
Purpose
* this model is to act as a roadmap for policy discussions
Scope
* whole scientific communication value chain
* focus is publishing, indexing, retrieval and reading of traditional peer reviewed journal articles
Model hierarchy
* 33 diagrams
* 113 activities
Conclusions
* this model can be useful in structuring comparisons between different business models
* it can also help in positioning different OA initiatives
Comment from the audience: (library whose name I didn't catch) found it useful to use and extend the models
Q (me): Can you assign a dollar value to each activity and do automatic calculations?
A: Yes but you need empirical data.
Comments