This is some very interesting work and a huge project that should greatly enrich our understanding of the usage of scientific information.
Johan Bollen - Los Alamos National Laboratory
"Scholarly impact: from ranking to assessment"
Scholarly evaluation matters
- qualitative and quantitative indicators
many features in scholarly status space
- prestige
- novelty
- visibility
etc.
[MESUR project]
various opportunity to extract metrics in the scholarly life-scucle
- usage data
- review data
- citation data
usage data is available before citation data
public.lanl.gov/jbollen/Publications.html
From ranking to assessment
we're in mode ranking 0.6
- single data source
- single criterion
... to assessment 3.0 [yecch]
- situate item in value landscape
- multiple sources of scholarly information
question: which dimensions to choose?
1) MESUR project
- survey wide range of possible indicators
2) Peer review
- study peer review process
Marko Rodriguez and others
Can we improve on citation data and the impact factor?
- perhaps usage data applies to a larger subset of the scholarly community,
capturing more scholarly objects and activities beyond journal articles
usage: COUNTER, IRS [?], SUSHI, CiteBase
MESUR: Metrics from Scholarly Usage of Resources
1 ontology to model the scholarly process
2 beg for usage data
3 dedupe
4 create semantic network
2/5th through the project
[ontology]
data 700million usage events and 1 bilion citations
10-15 billion triples
COUNTER logs, item-level data, SFX, etc.
link resolver data very good
[paper in JCDL 2006 about link resolver data gathering architecture]
they are using Franz's AllegroGraph triplestore
Network usage: usage graphs
"we should stop counting: we should look at relationships"
journal network - 50,000 journals
Example: Flow of information
[pretty network]
Metrics survey
many large organizations and sites are participating
U Texas case study...
[my comment: but isn't there an undergrad effect based on the articles they are assigned?]
principle component plot
[paper at JCDL 2007]
many issues and challenges
Comments