There is a line of argument popular in the mainstream media, most notably captured in Keen's The Cult of the Amateur. Another example was the nonsense in Maclean's cover "The Internet Sucks".
It goes something like this: "writers are trained professionals supported by editors", which is true, and then makes a leap to "therefore anyone who is NOT a professional and NOT supported by editors must be writing utter shite".
Yes, thank goodness for all that quality editing, that has produced well-crafted sentences of total untruth over the past years and decades.
Let me see if I can somehow craft a readable sentence even though I am bereft of an entire supporting organisation: a lot of what we get in the mainstream media is lazy, me-too, "consensus storytelling", factless junk.
I can't remember, are we still spending "blood and treasure" to clean up "pockets of resistance" or have we moved on to some other well-worn consensus story?
Remember, you must never break the narrative. You can never write about how Google is amazing, or Wikipedia is incredibly useful, or shopping online saves time while providing vastly more information than is available in the store.
Which brings me back to the current threadbare tale of how all amateur content is junk, and it's all lonely people in their basements writing about their cats and collections of Star Wars action figures.
Of course most of the net is junk. So is most TV, most movies, most music, most newspaper articles and most books. But usually people don't decide to dismiss the medium entirely (although I do know people who watch little or no television). Christie Blatchford, however, feels no such compunctions of reasonable balance, issuing a blanket dismissal:
Now, people merrily post their diaries online and call them blogs. The writing hasn't noticeably improved.
... most blogs: They are the writer's unedited, uncensored, unexpurgated thoughts.
...
So I do not read blogs, and if the day comes that, after I write for the newspaper, I am asked to write a blog for the online edition, I will take up surgery instead, or law, or social work. You know, without any training or practice at all.
In a related vein, I do not have any Facebook friends. I do not respond to invitations to be anyone's Facebook friend.
...
I am no one's beloved. I have no Facebook friends. I want no Facebook friends. I have no online community. I do not blog, I have not blogged, I will not blog and, furthermore, I do not care to read blogs.
Yeah, you tell it sister. I read a book once that wasn't good. So I guess I will stop reading books. Oh and I saw a TV show that sucked, so I no more television for me. Oh, and this one time, I read an article in the newspaper that was generic, lazy nonsense...
Globe and Mail - Dogs among blogs - Christie Blatchford - October 13, 2007 - behind a paywall, but available via rbcinvest.globeandmail.com
Recent Comments