Proceedings
International Association of Technological University Libraries (IATUL) 28th Annual Conference, 2007- "Global Access to Science: Scientific Publishing for the Future"
See my blogging of the conference in category IATUL2007.
Proceedings
International Association of Technological University Libraries (IATUL) 28th Annual Conference, 2007- "Global Access to Science: Scientific Publishing for the Future"
See my blogging of the conference in category IATUL2007.
Posted by Richard Akerman on October 19, 2007 at 11:30 AM in Conference, IATUL2007 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Reblog
(0)
|
|
Global Access to Science- Scientific Publishing for the Future: A Report of IATUL 2007 Conference Held at KTH, the Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden, June 11 - 14, 2007
Maitrayee Ghosh, Indian Institute of Technology; and Manik Mandal, National Institute of Technology, Durgapur, India
doi:10.1045/september2007-ghosh
IATUL 2007 stressed the importance of global collaboration in exchanging ideas and project experiences through various channels of communication, in areas ranging from information literacy, open access to information, scholarly communication, institutional repositories, outreach services, faculty and library collaboration in various research programs, pricing issues with publishers and – last but not least – the crucial information needs of users within the participants' institutions.
Posted by Richard Akerman on September 21, 2007 at 07:13 AM in Conference, IATUL2007 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Reblog
(0)
|
|
Joris van Rossum
Scirus, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Science-specific Search: Bridging the gap in dissemination of and access to information
Scirus is the free science search engine
he previously worked as a senior product manager at Scopus
(the pay science search engine http://www.scopus.com/ )
Content [Overview]
* How has content provision changed?
* How has information retrieval changed?
* Future trends
Internet has made journal publishing just one of many options for scientific content communication
why is there still journal publishing?
* stamp of authority
* versioning challenge - journal has version of record
* archiving - publishers ensure the article will always be available online
Increasing amount of content available online
* high amount of published content
- Scopus has 30 million abstracts
- ScienceDirect has 8 million articles
* amount of scholarly web content even higher
- Scirus currently indexes over 400 million scholarly web pages
(feel they need to add another 400 million on top of that in order to be complete at this moment)
* size of general web has exploded
- as of August 2005 Yahoo indexed over 19 billion pages
- Google says it indexes 3x more than that
Different content discovery methods
* browsing
* linking
* alerting
* searching
* user collaboration/sharing (potentially very strong, even replacing searching)
based on analysis from ScienceDirect usage logs
Browsing
* used to keep abreast of latest developmetns in subject area
* 31% of all full text article use on ScienceDirect is a result of journal browsing
* users that start this way download on average 1.9 articles
Linking
* very effective content discovery method
* publishers are collaborating through CrossRef to ensure correct reference linking
* 8% of all full text article use on ScienceDirect comes from reference linking
- Same is expect from 'cited-by' links
* next to reference and cited-by links in official literature there is
- web ref and cite-by
- patent ref and cite-by
- clustering
- author linking
citation paradigm applies beyond the official literature
Alerting
* journal issue [TOC] (RSS)
* top articles
* citation
* search
2-4% of downloads come from alerting
Search is the main driver of journal article use
* exponential growth of PubMed and ScienceDirect searches
- growth rates between 20-110% from 2001-2005
* search has overtaken browsing
[missed rest of slide]
search is important because it yields more than just journal results
* general web search (Google) often 1st choice for scientists (66%) and physicians (55%)
* subject-specific search platforms remain important
- avg. # of full text article downloads per sesson from PubMed is 3, from general search is 1.5
screenshot of Scirus, specialised science features
role of librarians in improving integration:
- search on library homepage, OpenURL (Scirus Library Partners)
*** User Collaboration and Sharing - The Future of Information Sharing ***
Combining browsing, linking, alerting and search in a community and network-driven system
... Scirus will launch a new community service in a couple weeks
Q: researchers aren't always searching for articles - in computer science we are interested in
aggregates e.g. projects and research programs
A: the new service will offer topic-based collected search and resources relevant to a particular area
Q (Jens): journal publishing enduring... authority good - versions ? - archival not true!
A:
archiving ScienceDirect - The Hague - for free - even if Elsevier disappears, info will still be available
why is Elsevier concerned about archiving
- helps provide confidence to move everyone to e-only
- gives authors confidence
Posted by Richard Akerman on June 14, 2007 at 04:50 AM in Academic Library Future, Conference, IATUL2007, Research Tools, Science, Searching | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Reblog
(0)
|
|
grey - speaker
green - accompanying person?
red - regular attendee
blue - tech/conference support
yellow - vendor (DANGER! DANGER! :)
Posted by Richard Akerman on June 14, 2007 at 02:59 AM in Conference, IATUL2007 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Reblog
(0)
|
|
I have posted my presentation to SlideShare
http://www.slideshare.net/scilib/library-serviceoriented-architecture-to-enhance-access-to-science
and you can also download the PowerPoint from there (thanks to Amazon S3 storage via SlideShare).
All of the bookmarks in the presentation along with some supplementary links are available at
http://www.connotea.org/user/scilib/tag/iatul2007akerman
I was pleased with the response to my presentation. There was interest from people in many different roles and organisations, and I am becoming increasingly convinced that at least for national library scale IT projects, SOA is gaining increasing traction.
I will use this posting as a starting point for discussions and any further ideas I may think to add.
UPDATE 2007-09-06: My paper is available in E-LIS.
Posted by Richard Akerman on June 12, 2007 at 04:16 PM in Academic Library Future, Conference, E-Science, IATUL2007, Links to Presentations, Science, Service-Oriented Architecture | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack (0)
Reblog
(0)
|
|
Dr. Lars Juhl Jensen
EMBL-Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
Biomedical literature mining (and why we really need Open Access)
UPDATE: Presentation (PowerPoint) now online. ENDUPDATE
MEDLINE
17 million citations
too much to read -> literature mining (get a computer to read them)
but to do that, you need access to the papers
discipline: info retrieval - finding the papers
ad hoc retrieval
MEDLINE - abstracts only
but would like to run on full text
next discipline: entity recognition
need synonyms / mapping lists - manual
plus orthographic variation
ihop
http://www.ihop-net.org/UniPub/iHOP/
discipline: information extraction
formalizing the facts - turning text into databases
Jensen et al Nature Reviews Genetics 2006
new discoveries - text mining
http://arrowsmith.psych.uic.edu/arrowsmith_uic/
mining temporal trends
timeline of buzzwords
integration of text and data
genotype to phenotype
Korbel et al PLoS Biology 2005 heatmap
UPDATE: I'm almost certain he's referencing
Korbel JO, Doerks T, Jensen LJ, Perez-Iratxeta C, Kaczanowski S, et al. (2005) Systematic Association of Genes to Phenotypes by Genome and Literature Mining. PLoS Biol 3(5): e134 doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0030134
ENDUPDATE
where are we now?
the tools are there... we need the text
Q: how are researchers using tools?
A: unfortunately many of them aren't aware the tools exist
Q: copyright obstacles - collections of abstracts copyrighted (protection of database) - is this a problem?
full text - could authors prepare a second abstract for literature mining specifically?
A: extraction of facts... isn't really copyright violation
rather than having second abstract, just deposit semantic information and data directly into a database
Q: how does this relate to Biomart?
http://www.biomart.org/
A: they are trying to glue together different data sources
Posted by Richard Akerman on June 12, 2007 at 06:44 AM in Conference, IATUL2007, Links to Presentations, Presentation Notes, Science | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Reblog
(0)
|
|
Peter Morgan
University of Cambridge/Imperial College London, Cambridge CB3 9DR, UK
Facilitating the disposit of experimental chemistry data in institutional repositories: Project SPECTRa
http://www.lib.cam.ac.uk/spectra/
* Research data and Open Access
* Institutional context
Research Data and Open Access
* 855 repositories - only 6% contain data
* machine-understandable data is needed for
- eScience
- etc.
* Open Data is not the same as OA
* OA licenses often don't address reuse of data
University of Cambridge
* few OA research papers
* large collection ( >175,000 files) of chemistry data files
* chemistry department (Peter Murray-Rust) keen to explore potential of repository
SPECTRa project
* 3 project staff plus librarians & chemists
* end March 2007
aims
* investigate needs in capturing and re-using (chemistry research) data, as well as actually capturing
Survey results
* much data not stored electronically
* many file formats (mainly proprietary)
* ignorance of IRs
* need to restrict access to data
* publication of chemical structures must be embargoed
separate repositories - departmental level ->
institutional repository to includ co-ordinated network of repositories
Conclusions
- there is an optimum moment for data capture
- researchers may not be willing to change their workflows
- data embargo necessary
- need both automated deposit and subsequent human editing
- used DPSpace handles rather than DOIs, but there were handle management issues
* need for researcher education and legal guidance on data sharing and reuse
Posted by Richard Akerman on June 12, 2007 at 06:42 AM in Conference, Data Management, IATUL2007, Presentation Notes, Science | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Reblog
(0)
|
|
Ralph Schroeder
Oxford Internet Institute, Oxford, UK
http://www.oii.ox.ac.uk/
e-Research infrastructures and scientific communication
Oxford e-Social Science Project
* Emergent Patterns in Scientific and Scholarly Communication
Background
* networks of tools and data shared by communities of researchers
Is e-Science a niche, or is it the new science (the new system of knowledge production).
Emerging Patterns
* Recognition of data as valid scientific outputs
* Fragmented communication system in relation nto e-Research
* Alternative models of dissemination by-pass traditional models
Components of Infrastructures and e-Research
* Policy
* Organizational and technical forces
* Everyday practices of researchers
* Openness
- various parts of the digital infrastructure ... should be able to interrelate in a flexible
and seamless way
- difficult to achieve in practice
- forms of openness still fluid
traditional distinction between tools and resources being blurred
Developing Countries
* levels of participation
- network
- scientific communication
DCs mostly not at cutting edge in uses of truly advanced networks
OA and IRs provide a level of participation for DCs in scientific communication
Challenge: consideration of how the developing world may be kept in line with e-Research
developments
Conclusions
* e-Research systems add a layer of complexity
* Making open systems extend to DCs involves a range of issues
Posted by Richard Akerman on June 12, 2007 at 06:37 AM in Conference, E-Science, IATUL2007, Presentation Notes | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Reblog
(0)
|
|
Eric Kansa
Alexandria Archive Inst, Univ of Santa Clara, Berkeley, CA, USA
An open context for small-scale field science data
Open Context
[will move to UCBerkley School of Information - Services]
* small/field sciences
- lack of standards
* challenges
- data preservation
- data access and reuse
- data integration and synthesis
materials collections & field research data -> Open Context -> dissemination (common services)
complex querying
* data from multiple projects can be queried together
citation information with stable URL
COinS microformat - readble by Zotero
working on tools to allow individuals to publish their own material through Open Context
currently using version of AchaeoML -> so data sets require mapping to this schema
features
* can tag items
* can tag the results of queries
* support ping-backs (trackbacks)
folksonomies are easy to use and effective
Future Directions
- distributed architecture / web services [with UC Berkeley]
* Your collaboration
Posted by Richard Akerman on June 11, 2007 at 05:20 PM in Conference, Data Management, IATUL2007, Presentation Notes, Science | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Reblog
(0)
|
|
Jan Brase
German National Library of Science and Technology (TIB), Hannover, Germany
A system for easy access to scientific information using DOIs
Motivation
* publications are based on scientific data sets that cannot be accessed
* collecting data is not honoured with scientific reputation
We need
* a persistent identifier
* enabling citations of data
registration
* URL where data can be accessed, plus XML file of biblio metadata including info
needed for citation of electronic media (ISO 690-2)
TIB assigns a DOI
More Scientific Content with DOIs
* radiology case studies
* Eurographics grey literature
* eBank from UK Office for Library Networking - DOIs for crystal structures
* CERN theses
* final reports of projects funded by the German government
Scope
* TIB will register primary data worldwide from an STM background
* plus any scitech content that is a result of community funded research in Europe
* Depending on number of DOIs the price per DOI is from 0.5 to 0.005 euros
DOI registration could be added into scientific workflow, or publishing workflow
Status
* the first 500,000 objects have been registered
* some are in the current catalogue
* each registered object will be accessed via a new catalogue at the library
Future
* share the responsibility
* worldwide union of local technical libraries to establish a global non-commercial scientific
DOI registration agency
* join us
Q: relationship to VASCODA?
http://www.vascoda.de/
A: Not yet
Q: Why DOIs and not URLs
A: URL might go away, DOI will always resolve to something (there is a global DOI resolver)
Posted by Richard Akerman on June 11, 2007 at 05:17 PM in Conference, Data Management, IATUL2007, Presentation Notes | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Reblog
(0)
|
|
I found the following presentation very interesting, it presents an attempt to completely model all aspects of scientific communication. Very ambitious and also a useful step in getting us all to a common vocabulary and understanding. I think there are still many challenges, including getting us all onto a common modelling standard, and modelling library activities beyond just the scholarly communication parts. CISTI has done a lot of work in this area, and I will be talking about some of it tomorrow (June 12).
Bo-Christer Björk
Hanken, Svenska handelshögskolan, Helsinki, Finland
A model of scientific communication of a global distributed information system
http://informationr.net/ir/12-2/paper307.html
[modeling scientific communication IT systems]
Two ways for complex info systems to develop
* top down, planned
* bottom up, independently
scientific communication is a good example of bottom up
common items in scientific communication
- article, author, journal etc.
main uses of info in sci com
* communicating research results
* supporting funders and university administrators in deciding about grants and appointments
Backgorund of the SCLC model
* developed since 2000
* SciX project (EC)
* OACS project (Academy of Finland)
Purpose
* this model is to act as a roadmap for policy discussions
Scope
* whole scientific communication value chain
* focus is publishing, indexing, retrieval and reading of traditional peer reviewed journal articles
Model hierarchy
* 33 diagrams
* 113 activities
Conclusions
* this model can be useful in structuring comparisons between different business models
* it can also help in positioning different OA initiatives
Comment from the audience: (library whose name I didn't catch) found it useful to use and extend the models
Q (me): Can you assign a dollar value to each activity and do automatic calculations?
A: Yes but you need empirical data.
Posted by Richard Akerman on June 11, 2007 at 05:15 PM in Conference, IATUL2007, Presentation Notes, Science | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Reblog
(0)
|
|
Jens Vigen, Library Director
CERN, Geneva, Switzerland
Open Access and repositories : beyond green and gold
both subject repositories and institutional repositories
* subject repositories - used by researchers
* institutional repositories - store and track organisation's research output
constructing new repository system
applied for grant for 50 person years over the next 4 years
standing on digital shoulders
* more than 15 years after the invention of the Web, scientific information remains an electronic clone
of the paper era
* specialized libraries can play a pivotal role in preparing the route for their communities
towards eScience
Scientific information provision in the era of eScience
* full text and data mining
* detection of relations between articles
* treatment of large datasets for satistical and citation analyses
* identification of popular and influential articles and authors with complementary ranking criteria:
alternative metrics to ISI
* access to numerical info from figures and tables within articles
* offer integrated access to primary scientific data
[mentions some interesting work at LANL on mapping relationships between articles]
[belives the EU 7th framework will produce a lot of results in the above areas]
HEP (high energy physics)
* infrastructure for repository of scientific information
* entire corpus of HEP information in one place
* current priority
- empower the repository with new technology and conent: enabling researchs to explore information
matching the emerging expectations of the eScience era
survey to see if they are meeting user needs
results will be published as a paper
systems used
3% publisher portals
11% google
86% community services
- 28% subject repositories
- 58% specialised libraries
tagcloud (tagcrowd)
important features of an information system
* 93% depth of coverage
* 91% quality of content
* 94% access to full text
* 93% search accuracy
What changes do (surveyed responders) expect?
* seamless access to articles via portal
* improved full-text search
* conference presentations indexed and link to articles
* publication of data
* peer-review overlaid on subject repositories
* smarter search tools
dreams
* see research in context, follow a research thread
* ... more
VIsion
* build a complete HEP information system
* with full-text, data-mining etc.
* demonstrate and deploy Web 2.0 applications in the domain of sciences
Conclusions
...
* librarians have the opportunity to play a key role in the era of eScience
* express interest if you would like to join
Comment: engineering is not as advanced in information use
Posted by Richard Akerman on June 11, 2007 at 05:08 PM in Academic Library Future, Conference, E-Science, IATUL2007, Open Access, Presentation Notes | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Reblog
(0)
|
|
Dr. Håkan Carlsson
Lund University, Sweden
Open Access - Reaching the Masses
OA
* increased visibility, usability, impact
* sounder business model
* full-text mining
Two Important Questions
* what is the response of the university libraries
- is it a researcher question, not a library question?
* how is the work best organised
reference to CURL/RIN report on Researcher's Use of Academic Libraries and their Services
Library Services for Research
* Scientific communication support with a focus on publication activities is a promising way to
extend services
* The library is not there to promote OA, but to support the whole publication process, in which
OA is an important part
OA at Lund University
2007 Mandatory *registration* of all university publications
library needs to assess needed competencies and provide services accordingly
Infrastructure
* new custom software - LUR (stable, combines registration/archiving)
* journal hosting - Open Journal Systems
* financial support for publication fees?
New Service
* help the researcher choose the appropriate journals to publish in, and help them with getting
published
- give information on all aspects of journals
Journal Info
Posted by Richard Akerman on June 11, 2007 at 08:04 AM in Conference, IATUL2007, Open Access, Presentation Notes | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Reblog
(0)
|
|
As you can see I'm doing some blogging about the sessions.
As well, although I have to admit I don't quite get Twitter (how much awareness monitoring can people possibly want?), I am twittering
Posted by Richard Akerman on June 11, 2007 at 05:07 AM in Conference, IATUL2007 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Reblog
(0)
|
|
UPDATE 2007-06-14: I invite you to read some additional background information about these notes. ENDUPDATE
Dr. Rüdiger Voss
Physics Dep, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland
Open Access Publishing in Particle Physics
convert entire discipline to open access journal publishing
approximately 10,000 scientists worldwide
5016 articles published in 2005 in peer-reviewed journals
83% of all papers in 6 journals
87% of all papers published by 4 different publishers
CERN Convention (1953) is an early OA manifesto
embrace OA movement (arXiv.org)
* today particle physics is almost entirely greeen
* without mandates, without debate
peer-reviewed journals remain important as version-of-record archives and as
key instruments of merit recognition and career promotion
OA landscape in 2007
* most particle physics journals offer OA options
- hybrid model, authors buy OA to articles
- reluctant take-up by authors
* gold OA to journals is there, but variety of options bewildering
in 2005: 72.6% NO OA option
in 2007: 86.8% offer OA option
time is ripe for a full transition to OA
OA issues
* grant universal access to peer-reviewed results of publically funded research
* in a green environment authors benefit for peer review and journal prestige
* bring subscription costs under control
* raise researcher awareness of economics of scientific publishing
* inject competition into scientific publishing by linking price to quality
* stabilize the diversity and future of journals which have served particle physics well - but leave
room for new players
SCOAP3 model
http://www.cern.ch/oa/Scoap3WPReport.pdf
in a nutshell
* global consortium of funding agencies and libraries to convert all research journals important
to particle physics to open access
- funded through redirect of subscription budgets
* OA implemented through contracts between SCOAP3 and publishers
- full sponsoring of core journals
- partial sponder of broader topic journals
* SCOAP3 sponsors e-journals only; publishers free to charge readers for print and other
premium services
* estimated annual budget: 10 million euros
* contributions on a "fair share" basis by nationality (affiliation) of articles/authors
How to put it together?
LHC is a much bigger project, 40 funding agencies, 550 million $
Benefits
* online journals free to read for anybody
* preserve high-quality peer review process
* generate medium and long-term savings for libraries and funding agencies
* free to read and to publish for developing countries
SCOAP3 Status
* report distributed
* more work needed
* potential funding parters to be invited soon to sign Expressions of Interest
* once partners commit to sizeable fraction of budget, invite publishers to tender in autumn
* Goal: have SCOAP3 operational for the first LHC papers
Posted by Richard Akerman on June 11, 2007 at 04:46 AM in Conference, IATUL2007, Open Access, Presentation Notes | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Reblog
(0)
|
|
UPDATE 2007-06-14: I invite you to read some additional background information about these notes. ENDUPDATE
Tom Cochrane, Deputy Vice-Chancellor
Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia
see Microsoft 2020 report
http://research.microsoft.com/towards2020science/background_overview.htm
Global access to science – meeting the revolution
2. open access
3. e-research/e-science/cyberinfrastructure
the new science will challenge university IT and library capabilities in unprecendented ways
paper used to be a challenge
beware short term hype, which is underpinned by a failure to understand the long-term impact
shift to electronic full text
Institutional Repository
QUT has mandated research deposit
materials that could be commercialised are excluded from the repository
mostly post-prints being deposited
QUT shows top 10 authors / top 10 papers
focus on collecting research
Rise of Mandates for Open Access
Gold or Green
Gold - pay publisher
Green - more controlled by researcher
changing scientific communication
journal title = research quality?
OAK Law Project
http://www.oaklaw.qut.edu.au/
Legal Framework for e-Research Conference 2007
*** Semantic loss
limitations of publishing
"Those who focus on open access, far from being radical, are not being nearly radical enough"
- Timo Hannay
Responding to the Data Deluge
** NCRIS Platforms for Collaboration
? Investment Plan
Challenges
* understand changing scholarly publishing ("keep up")
* readiness to lead in enhancing accessibility
* clarify role of repositories
* repudiate view that problems are too big
* knowledge of changes to science
* lead, or share the lead, in dealing with the data deluge
Q: researchers overwhelmed by time needed to referree articles
A: true but not a new problem
some disciplines spreading the load by using automated systems for blind referreeing
Posted by Richard Akerman on June 11, 2007 at 04:44 AM in Conference, IATUL2007, Presentation Notes | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Reblog
(0)
|
|
The ELPUB 2007 and IATUL 2007 programmes are up. Both will feature topics in the areas of open access and scholarly communication. It's interesting to me how much the technology and interests of the scholarly publishing community and the academic library community seem to be converging.
At ELPUB 2007, CISTI's Judy Best will be presenting
Posted by Richard Akerman on May 09, 2007 at 05:09 AM in Academic Library Future, CISTI, Conference, IATUL2007, Institutional Repository, Open Access, Publishing, Science, Software Development | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Reblog
(0)
|
|
I am pleased to announce that I will be presenting my paper "Library Service-Oriented Architecture to Enhance Access to Science" at IATUL 2007, my session is tentatively scheduled for
Tuesday June 12th 2007 at 10 am
The presentation will be about 20 minutes plus 5 minutes for questions.
UPDATE 2007-06-12: The presentation has now been completed and is available online. ENDUPDATE
My paper is a brief summary of CISTI's EA and SOA success, based on the efforts of the rest of the architecture and application development teams. I intend it both as a demonstration of what is possible, as well as a discussion starter, to help other libraries move beyond basic theoretical frameworks to start building a richer network of library machine-to-machine data services that we can all use for applications, websites, mashups, and whatever is coming next.
Posted by Richard Akerman on April 26, 2007 at 02:36 AM in Conference, Enterprise Architecture, IATUL2007, Service-Oriented Architecture | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack (0)
Reblog
(0)
|
|
I have done a Google Earth KMZ of the IATUL 2007 hotel options and venue.
UPDATE 2007-06-09: I have done a new version that adds the conference halls and the central train station.
Posted by Richard Akerman on March 26, 2007 at 11:25 AM in Conference, IATUL2007, Mapping | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Reblog
(0)
|
|
The site for IATUL 2007 is up
28th International Association of Technology University Libraries conference 2007
June 11-14, 2007
Stockholm, Sweden
The conference's theme is Global Access to Science - Scientific Publishing for the Future.
No CFP yet. UPDATE 2007-03-20: CFP has closed. ENDUPDATE
No RSS feed :(
I will be using tag IATUL2007 for this conference.
Posted by Richard Akerman on July 09, 2006 at 08:46 AM in Academic Library Future, Conference, IATUL2007, Publishing, Science | Permalink | Comments (0)
Reblog
(0)
|
|
Recent Comments